1995 Alfa Romeo 145 vs. 2006 Mazda CX-7
To start off, 2006 Mazda CX-7 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Alfa Romeo 145. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Alfa Romeo 145 would be higher. At 2,298 cc, 2006 Mazda CX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda CX-7 (244 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 142 more horse power than 1995 Alfa Romeo 145. (102 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda CX-7 should accelerate faster than 1995 Alfa Romeo 145.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda CX-7 (350 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 206 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Alfa Romeo 145. (144 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda CX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Alfa Romeo 145. 2006 Mazda CX-7 has automatic transmission and 1995 Alfa Romeo 145 has manual transmission. 1995 Alfa Romeo 145 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Mazda CX-7 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Alfa Romeo 145 | 2006 Mazda CX-7 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Mazda |
Model | 145 | CX-7 |
Year Released | 1995 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 2298 cc |
Horse Power | 102 HP | 244 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 144 Nm | 350 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |