1995 Alfa Romeo 146 vs. 1951 Allard K2
To start off, 1995 Alfa Romeo 146 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Alfa Romeo 146 (103 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1951 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Alfa Romeo 146 should accelerate faster than 1951 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Allard K2 weights approximately 20 kg more than 1995 Alfa Romeo 146.
Because 1951 Allard K2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Allard K2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Alfa Romeo 146, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Alfa Romeo 146 | 1951 Allard K2 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Allard |
| Model | 146 | K2 |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1951 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1596 cc | 3622 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | V |
| Horse Power | 103 HP | 85 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1175 kg | 1195 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4260 mm | 4270 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1580 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2700 mm |
