1995 Alfa Romeo 146 vs. 1952 Triumph Renown
To start off, 1995 Alfa Romeo 146 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Triumph Renown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Triumph Renown would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Triumph Renown is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Alfa Romeo 146 (150 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 1952 Triumph Renown. (66 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Alfa Romeo 146 should accelerate faster than 1952 Triumph Renown. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Triumph Renown weights approximately 55 kg more than 1995 Alfa Romeo 146.
Let's talk about torque, 1995 Alfa Romeo 146 (187 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Triumph Renown. (147 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1995 Alfa Romeo 146 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Triumph Renown.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Alfa Romeo 146 | 1952 Triumph Renown | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Triumph |
| Model | 146 | Renown |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1970 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 66 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 187 Nm | 147 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 85 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 92 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1225 kg | 1280 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4260 mm | 4450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2750 mm |
