1995 Alfa Romeo 146 vs. 1958 Studebaker Sky Hawk
To start off, 1995 Alfa Romeo 146 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 2,779 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 Studebaker Sky Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Studebaker Sky Hawk weights approximately 125 kg more than 1995 Alfa Romeo 146.
Because 1958 Studebaker Sky Hawk is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Studebaker Sky Hawk. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Alfa Romeo 146, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Alfa Romeo 146 | 1958 Studebaker Sky Hawk | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Studebaker |
Model | 146 | Sky Hawk |
Year Released | 1995 | 1958 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 2779 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 103 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1175 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4260 mm | 5150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2980 mm |