1995 Alfa Romeo 146 vs. 1963 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1995 Alfa Romeo 146 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1995 Alfa Romeo 146. (129 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1995 Alfa Romeo 146. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 865 kg more than 1995 Alfa Romeo 146. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Alfa Romeo 146 | 1963 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
| Model | 146 | 62 |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1712 cc | 6390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | V |
| Horse Power | 129 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 101.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 98.4 mm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1225 kg | 2090 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4260 mm | 5680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 79 L |
