1995 Alfa Romeo 146 vs. 1963 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600
To start off, 1995 Alfa Romeo 146 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600 would be higher. At 2,636 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1963 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Alfa Romeo 146, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Alfa Romeo 146 | 1963 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Willys-Overland |
Model | 146 | Aero-Willys 2600 |
Year Released | 1995 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 2636 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 103 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4260 mm | 4820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2740 mm |