1995 Alfa Romeo 146 vs. 1968 Cadillac Calais
To start off, 1995 Alfa Romeo 146 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Cadillac Calais (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 138 more horse power than 1995 Alfa Romeo 146. (90 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 1995 Alfa Romeo 146. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 930 kg more than 1995 Alfa Romeo 146. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1968 Cadillac Calais (711 Nm) has 596 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Alfa Romeo 146. (115 Nm). This means 1968 Cadillac Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Alfa Romeo 146.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Alfa Romeo 146 | 1968 Cadillac Calais | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
| Model | 146 | Calais |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1351 cc | 7734 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | V |
| Horse Power | 90 HP | 228 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Torque | 115 Nm | 711 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 109.2 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 67.2 mm | 103.1 mm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1175 kg | 2105 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4260 mm | 5720 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 82 L |
