1995 Alfa Romeo 146 vs. 1981 Cadillac Brougham
To start off, 1995 Alfa Romeo 146 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 5,032 cc (8 cylinders), 1981 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 731 kg more than 1995 Alfa Romeo 146.
Because 1981 Cadillac Brougham is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Cadillac Brougham. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Alfa Romeo 146, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Alfa Romeo 146 | 1981 Cadillac Brougham | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
Model | 146 | Brougham |
Year Released | 1995 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1712 cc | 5032 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | V |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1225 kg | 1956 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4260 mm | 5630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3090 mm |