1995 Alfa Romeo 146 vs. 1986 Caterham 1700
To start off, 1995 Alfa Romeo 146 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Caterham 1700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Caterham 1700 would be higher. At 1,692 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Caterham 1700 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Caterham 1700 (168 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 1995 Alfa Romeo 146. (90 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Caterham 1700 should accelerate faster than 1995 Alfa Romeo 146.
Because 1986 Caterham 1700 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Caterham 1700. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Alfa Romeo 146, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Alfa Romeo 146 | 1986 Caterham 1700 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Caterham |
Model | 146 | 1700 |
Year Released | 1995 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1351 cc | 1692 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Top Speed | 179 km/hour | 188 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4260 mm | 3390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1050 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2260 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 36 L |