1995 Alfa Romeo 146 vs. 2004 Mazda 3

To start off, 2004 Mazda 3 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Alfa Romeo 146. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Alfa Romeo 146 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda 3 (144 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1995 Alfa Romeo 146. (103 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1995 Alfa Romeo 146. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda 3 weights approximately 48 kg more than 1995 Alfa Romeo 146. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda 3 (184 Nm) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Alfa Romeo 146. (134 Nm). This means 2004 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Alfa Romeo 146.

Compare all specifications:

1995 Alfa Romeo 146 2004 Mazda 3
Make Alfa Romeo Mazda
Model 146 3
Year Released 1995 2004
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1596 cc 1998 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type boxer in-line
Horse Power 103 HP 144 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 134 Nm 184 Nm
Engine Bore Size 84 mm 87 mm
Engine Stroke Size 72 mm 83 mm
Drive Type Front Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1175 kg 1223 kg
Vehicle Length 4260 mm 4540 mm
Vehicle Width 1720 mm 1760 mm
Vehicle Height 1430 mm 1470 mm
Wheelbase Size 2550 mm 2760 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 50 L 55 L