1995 Alfa Romeo 164 vs. 1946 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1995 Alfa Romeo 164 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,676 cc (8 cylinders), 1946 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1946 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 384 kg more than 1995 Alfa Romeo 164.
Because 1946 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1946 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Alfa Romeo 164, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Alfa Romeo 164 | 1946 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
| Model | 164 | 62 |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1946 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2959 cc | 5676 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1482 kg | 1866 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 3280 mm |
