1995 Alfa Romeo 164 vs. 1952 Allard J2R
To start off, 1995 Alfa Romeo 164 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard J2R. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard J2R would be higher. At 5,415 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard J2R is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Alfa Romeo 164 weights approximately 484 kg more than 1952 Allard J2R.
Because 1952 Allard J2R is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Allard J2R. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Alfa Romeo 164, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Alfa Romeo 164 | 1952 Allard J2R | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Allard |
| Model | 164 | J2R |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2959 cc | 5415 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 251 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1482 kg | 998 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2440 mm |
