1995 Alfa Romeo 164 vs. 1962 Cadillac Biarritz
To start off, 1995 Alfa Romeo 164 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac Biarritz. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac Biarritz would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac Biarritz is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac Biarritz weights approximately 698 kg more than 1995 Alfa Romeo 164.
Because 1962 Cadillac Biarritz is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Cadillac Biarritz. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Alfa Romeo 164, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Alfa Romeo 164 | 1962 Cadillac Biarritz | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
Model | 164 | Biarritz |
Year Released | 1995 | 1962 |
Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2959 cc | 6388 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 197 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1482 kg | 2180 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 3300 mm |