1995 Alfa Romeo 164 vs. 1965 Pontiac Catalina
To start off, 1995 Alfa Romeo 164 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Pontiac Catalina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Pontiac Catalina would be higher. At 6,891 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Pontiac Catalina is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Pontiac Catalina weights approximately 403 kg more than 1995 Alfa Romeo 164.
Because 1965 Pontiac Catalina is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Pontiac Catalina. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Alfa Romeo 164, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Alfa Romeo 164 | 1965 Pontiac Catalina | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Pontiac |
| Model | 164 | Catalina |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2959 cc | 6891 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 376 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1482 kg | 1885 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 3080 mm |
