1995 Alfa Romeo 164 vs. 1992 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 1995 Alfa Romeo 164 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Toyota 4Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Toyota 4Runner would be higher. At 2,959 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Alfa Romeo 164 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 120 kg more than 1995 Alfa Romeo 164.
Because 1992 Toyota 4Runner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Alfa Romeo 164. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Toyota 4Runner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Alfa Romeo 164 | 1992 Toyota 4Runner | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Toyota |
| Model | 164 | 4Runner |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1992 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2959 cc | 2366 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 112 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1482 kg | 1602 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2630 mm |
