1995 Alfa Romeo 164 vs. 2005 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Alfa Romeo 164. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Alfa Romeo 164 would be higher. At 2,959 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Alfa Romeo 164 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1018 kg more than 1995 Alfa Romeo 164.
Because 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Alfa Romeo 164. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Alfa Romeo 164 | 2005 Land Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Land Rover |
| Model | 164 | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2959 cc | 2926 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 175 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1482 kg | 2500 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2890 mm |
