1995 Alfa Romeo 164 vs. 2010 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2010 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Alfa Romeo 164. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Alfa Romeo 164 would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 673 kg more than 1995 Alfa Romeo 164.
Because 2010 Toyota 4Runner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Alfa Romeo 164. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Toyota 4Runner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Alfa Romeo 164 | 2010 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Toyota |
Model | 164 | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1995 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2959 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 270 HP |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1482 kg | 2155 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2789 mm |