1995 Alfa Romeo GTV vs. 1969 Jaguar 240
To start off, 1995 Alfa Romeo GTV is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Jaguar 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Jaguar 240 would be higher. At 2,483 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Jaguar 240 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Alfa Romeo GTV (138 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1969 Jaguar 240. (131 HP @ 5550 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Alfa Romeo GTV should accelerate faster than 1969 Jaguar 240. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Jaguar 240 weights approximately 125 kg more than 1995 Alfa Romeo GTV.
Because 1969 Jaguar 240 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Jaguar 240. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Alfa Romeo GTV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Jaguar 240 (198 Nm @ 3700 RPM) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Alfa Romeo GTV. (187 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1969 Jaguar 240 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Alfa Romeo GTV.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Alfa Romeo GTV | 1969 Jaguar 240 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Jaguar |
Model | GTV | 240 |
Year Released | 1995 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1970 cc | 2483 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 131 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5550 RPM |
Torque | 187 Nm | 198 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3700 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83.1 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 76.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 8.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1315 kg | 1440 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2740 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.6 L/100km | 12.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 54 L |