1995 Alpina B 12 vs. 1964 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 1995 Alpina B 12 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Alpina B 12 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Alpina B 12 weights approximately 705 kg more than 1964 Nissan Cedric.
Because 1964 Nissan Cedric is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Alpina B 12. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Nissan Cedric will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Alpina B 12 (469 Nm) has 354 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm). This means 1995 Alpina B 12 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Alpina B 12 | 1964 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | Alpina | Nissan |
| Model | B 12 | Cedric |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3500 cc | 1488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 60 HP |
| Torque | 469 Nm | 115 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1790 kg | 1085 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2540 mm |
