1995 Alpina B 12 vs. 1979 Mazda Cosmo

To start off, 1995 Alpina B 12 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Alpina B 12 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Alpina B 12 weights approximately 700 kg more than 1979 Mazda Cosmo.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Alpina B 12 (469 Nm) has 319 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Mazda Cosmo. (150 Nm). This means 1995 Alpina B 12 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Mazda Cosmo. 1979 Mazda Cosmo has automatic transmission and 1995 Alpina B 12 has manual transmission. 1995 Alpina B 12 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1979 Mazda Cosmo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1995 Alpina B 12 1979 Mazda Cosmo
Make Alpina Mazda
Model B 12 Cosmo
Year Released 1995 1979
Body Type Coupe Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3500 cc 1768 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 0 HP 93 HP
Torque 469 Nm 150 Nm
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 4 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1790 kg 1090 kg
Vehicle Length 4790 mm 4480 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1690 mm
Vehicle Height 1350 mm 1340 mm
Wheelbase Size 2690 mm 2520 mm