1995 Alpina B 12 vs. 2003 Caterham 7
To start off, 2003 Caterham 7 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Alpina B 12. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Alpina B 12 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Alpina B 12 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Alpina B 12 weights approximately 1290 kg more than 2003 Caterham 7.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Alpina B 12 (469 Nm) has 293 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Caterham 7. (176 Nm). This means 1995 Alpina B 12 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Caterham 7.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Alpina B 12 | 2003 Caterham 7 | |
Make | Alpina | Caterham |
Model | B 12 | 7 |
Year Released | 1995 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3500 cc | 1794 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 160 HP |
Torque | 469 Nm | 176 Nm |
Top Speed | 251 km/hour | 209 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1790 kg | 500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 3110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2230 mm |