1995 Alpina B6 vs. 2000 TVR Tuscan
To start off, 2000 TVR Tuscan is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Alpina B6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Alpina B6 would be higher. At 4,619 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Alpina B6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 TVR Tuscan (390 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 1995 Alpina B6. (329 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 TVR Tuscan should accelerate faster than 1995 Alpina B6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Alpina B6 weights approximately 330 kg more than 2000 TVR Tuscan.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Alpina B6 (470 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 TVR Tuscan. (420 Nm @ 5250 RPM). This means 1995 Alpina B6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 TVR Tuscan.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Alpina B6 | 2000 TVR Tuscan | |
Make | Alpina | TVR |
Model | B6 | Tuscan |
Year Released | 1995 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4619 cc | 3996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 329 HP | 390 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 470 Nm | 420 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1505 kg | 1175 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4240 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1210 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2370 mm |