1995 Audi 90 vs. 2013 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2013 Jeep Compass is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Audi 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Audi 90 would be higher. At 2,801 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Audi 90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 170 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jeep Compass weights approximately 26 kg more than 1995 Audi 90.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Audi 90 (251 Nm) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Jeep Compass. (224 Nm). This means 1995 Audi 90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Jeep Compass.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Audi 90 | 2013 Jeep Compass | |
Make | Audi | Jeep |
Model | 90 | Compass |
Year Released | 1995 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2801 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 170 HP |
Torque | 251 Nm | 224 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1447 kg | 1473 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4448 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1811 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1651 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2634 mm |