1995 Audi A4 vs. 1958 Cadillac Sixty
To start off, 1995 Audi A4 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Cadillac Sixty (189 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1995 Audi A4. (148 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1958 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 1995 Audi A4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 950 kg more than 1995 Audi A4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1958 Cadillac Sixty is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Cadillac Sixty. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Audi A4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Audi A4 | 1958 Cadillac Sixty | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | A4 | Sixty |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1958 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2598 cc | 5980 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 189 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1285 kg | 2235 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 5730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 3390 mm |
