1995 Audi A4 vs. 2000 Ford Artic
To start off, 2000 Ford Artic is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Audi A4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Audi A4 would be higher. At 3,998 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Artic is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2000 Ford Artic is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford Artic. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Audi A4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Audi A4 | 2000 Ford Artic | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | A4 | Artic |
Year Released | 1995 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2770 cc | 3998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 128 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 5240 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 3200 mm |