1995 Audi A6 vs. 1963 Riley One-Point-Five
To start off, 1995 Audi A6 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Riley One-Point-Five. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Riley One-Point-Five would be higher. At 2,771 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Audi A6 (176 HP) has 114 more horse power than 1963 Riley One-Point-Five. (62 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1963 Riley One-Point-Five.
Because 1995 Audi A6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Riley One-Point-Five. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Audi A6 (250 Nm) has 138 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Riley One-Point-Five. (112 Nm). This means 1995 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Riley One-Point-Five.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Audi A6 | 1963 Riley One-Point-Five | |
Make | Audi | Riley |
Model | A6 | One-Point-Five |
Year Released | 1995 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2771 cc | 1489 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 176 HP | 62 HP |
Torque | 250 Nm | 112 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 82.6 mm | 73.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 88.9 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.6:1 | 8.3:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1560 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2190 mm |