1995 Audi A6 vs. 1982 Holden Camira
To start off, 1995 Audi A6 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Holden Camira. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Holden Camira would be higher. At 2,771 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Audi A6 (176 HP) has 90 more horse power than 1982 Holden Camira. (86 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1982 Holden Camira.
Because 1995 Audi A6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Holden Camira. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Audi A6 (250 Nm) has 125 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Holden Camira. (125 Nm). This means 1995 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Holden Camira. 1982 Holden Camira has automatic transmission and 1995 Audi A6 has manual transmission. 1995 Audi A6 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1982 Holden Camira will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Audi A6 | 1982 Holden Camira | |
| Make | Audi | Holden |
| Model | A6 | Camira |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2771 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 176 HP | 86 HP |
| Torque | 250 Nm | 125 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4410 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2580 mm |
