1995 Audi A6 vs. 1983 Jaguar XJR
To start off, 1995 Audi A6 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 5,343 cc (12 cylinders), 1983 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Audi A6 weights approximately 845 kg more than 1983 Jaguar XJR.
Because 1995 Audi A6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Jaguar XJR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Audi A6 | 1983 Jaguar XJR | |
Make | Audi | Jaguar |
Model | A6 | XJR |
Year Released | 1995 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 4172 cc | 5343 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 286 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1745 kg | 900 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1050 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2870 mm |