1995 Audi RS2 vs. 1958 Buick 40
To start off, 1995 Audi RS2 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,971 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Buick 40 weights approximately 245 kg more than 1995 Audi RS2.
Because 1995 Audi RS2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1958 Buick 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Audi RS2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Audi RS2 | 1958 Buick 40 | |
| Make | Audi | Buick |
| Model | RS2 | 40 |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1958 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2226 cc | 5971 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 311 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1595 kg | 1840 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 3110 mm |
