1995 Audi RS2 vs. 1966 Cadillac Sixty
To start off, 1995 Audi RS2 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Audi RS2 (311 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 1966 Cadillac Sixty. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Audi RS2 should accelerate faster than 1966 Cadillac Sixty. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 520 kg more than 1995 Audi RS2.
Because 1995 Audi RS2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Cadillac Sixty. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Audi RS2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Audi RS2 | 1966 Cadillac Sixty | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | RS2 | Sixty |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2226 cc | 7029 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 311 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1595 kg | 2115 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 5790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 3390 mm |
