1995 Audi RS2 vs. 1968 Holden Monaro
To start off, 1995 Audi RS2 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Holden Monaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Holden Monaro would be higher. At 2,638 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Holden Monaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Audi RS2 (311 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 210 more horse power than 1968 Holden Monaro. (101 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Audi RS2 should accelerate faster than 1968 Holden Monaro.
Because 1995 Audi RS2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Holden Monaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Audi RS2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Audi RS2 (311 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 98 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Holden Monaro. (213 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1995 Audi RS2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Holden Monaro.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Audi RS2 | 1968 Holden Monaro | |
Make | Audi | Holden |
Model | RS2 | Monaro |
Year Released | 1995 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2226 cc | 2638 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 311 HP | 101 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 311 Nm | 213 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2830 mm |