1995 Audi RS2 vs. 1976 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 1995 Audi RS2 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 5,736 cc (8 cylinders), 1976 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1995 Audi RS2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Audi RS2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1976 Chevrolet Camaro has automatic transmission and 1995 Audi RS2 has manual transmission. 1995 Audi RS2 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1976 Chevrolet Camaro will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Audi RS2 | 1976 Chevrolet Camaro | |
| Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
| Model | RS2 | Camaro |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1976 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2226 cc | 5736 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 311 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1900 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2750 mm |
