1995 Audi RS2 vs. 1976 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 1995 Audi RS2 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 4,186 cc (8 cylinders), 1976 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Audi RS2 weights approximately 115 kg more than 1976 Ford Thunderbird.
Because 1995 Audi RS2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Ford Thunderbird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Audi RS2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1976 Ford Thunderbird has automatic transmission and 1995 Audi RS2 has manual transmission. 1995 Audi RS2 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1976 Ford Thunderbird will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Audi RS2 | 1976 Ford Thunderbird | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | RS2 | Thunderbird |
Year Released | 1995 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2226 cc | 4186 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 311 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1595 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 5100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2760 mm |