1995 Audi RS2 vs. 1979 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 1995 Audi RS2 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 2,226 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Audi RS2 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Audi RS2 weights approximately 785 kg more than 1979 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 1995 Audi RS2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1979 Mitsubishi Colt. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Audi RS2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Audi RS2 | 1979 Mitsubishi Colt | |
| Make | Audi | Mitsubishi |
| Model | RS2 | Colt |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1979 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2226 cc | 1244 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 311 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1595 kg | 810 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 3800 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2310 mm |
