1995 Audi RS2 vs. 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1995 Audi RS2 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Audi RS2 weights approximately 113 kg more than 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 1995 Audi RS2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Audi RS2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass has automatic transmission and 1995 Audi RS2 has manual transmission. 1995 Audi RS2 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Audi RS2 | 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Audi | Oldsmobile |
Model | RS2 | Cutlass |
Year Released | 1995 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2226 cc | 3790 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 311 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1595 kg | 1482 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 5530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2760 mm |