1995 Audi RS2 vs. 2004 GMC Safari
To start off, 2004 GMC Safari is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Audi RS2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Audi RS2 would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 GMC Safari is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Audi RS2 (311 HP) has 121 more horse power than 2004 GMC Safari. (190 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Audi RS2 should accelerate faster than 2004 GMC Safari. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 GMC Safari weights approximately 360 kg more than 1995 Audi RS2.
Because 1995 Audi RS2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 GMC Safari. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Audi RS2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 GMC Safari (339 Nm) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Audi RS2. (311 Nm). This means 2004 GMC Safari will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Audi RS2.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Audi RS2 | 2004 GMC Safari | |
Make | Audi | GMC |
Model | RS2 | Safari |
Year Released | 1995 | 2004 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2226 cc | 4294 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 311 HP | 190 HP |
Torque | 311 Nm | 339 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1595 kg | 1955 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1910 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2830 mm |