1995 Audi S6 vs. 1961 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1995 Audi S6 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Audi S6 (228 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1961 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Audi S6 should accelerate faster than 1961 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 335 kg more than 1995 Audi S6.
Because 1995 Audi S6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1961 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Audi S6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1961 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 232 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Audi S6. (350 Nm). This means 1961 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Audi S6.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Audi S6 | 1961 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | S6 | 62 |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1961 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2226 cc | 6390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 228 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 350 Nm | 582 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1735 kg | 2070 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 5650 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 75 L |
