1995 Audi S6 vs. 1963 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1995 Audi S6 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 320 kg more than 1995 Audi S6.
Because 1995 Audi S6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Audi S6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Audi S6 | 1963 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | S6 | 62 |
Year Released | 1995 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2226 cc | 6388 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1735 kg | 2055 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 5670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 3300 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 79 L |