1995 Audi S6 vs. 2003 Mitsubishi eK
To start off, 2003 Mitsubishi eK is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Audi S6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Audi S6 would be higher. At 2,226 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Audi S6 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Audi S6 weights approximately 945 kg more than 2003 Mitsubishi eK.
Because 1995 Audi S6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Mitsubishi eK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Audi S6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Mitsubishi eK has automatic transmission and 1995 Audi S6 has manual transmission. 1995 Audi S6 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Mitsubishi eK will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Audi S6 | 2003 Mitsubishi eK | |
Make | Audi | Mitsubishi |
Model | S6 | eK |
Year Released | 1995 | 2003 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2226 cc | 656 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1735 kg | 790 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2350 mm |