1995 Audi TT vs. 1956 Buick 40
To start off, 1995 Audi TT is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,279 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Buick 40 (252 HP) has 102 more horse power than 1995 Audi TT. (150 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1956 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 1995 Audi TT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Buick 40 weights approximately 370 kg more than 1995 Audi TT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1995 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1956 Buick 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1956 Buick 40 (462 Nm) has 252 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Audi TT. (210 Nm). This means 1956 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Audi TT | 1956 Buick 40 | |
Make | Audi | Buick |
Model | TT | 40 |
Year Released | 1995 | 1956 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 5279 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 252 HP |
Torque | 210 Nm | 462 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81.1 mm | 101.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 81.4 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1220 kg | 1590 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 3110 mm |