1995 Audi TT vs. 1961 Jeep CJ5
To start off, 1995 Audi TT is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1961 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Audi TT (150 HP) has 91 more horse power than 1961 Jeep CJ5. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1961 Jeep CJ5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Audi TT weights approximately 190 kg more than 1961 Jeep CJ5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Audi TT (210 Nm) has 64 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Jeep CJ5. (146 Nm). This means 1995 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Jeep CJ5.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Audi TT | 1961 Jeep CJ5 | |
| Make | Audi | Jeep |
| Model | TT | CJ5 |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1961 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1781 cc | 2199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 59 HP |
| Torque | 210 Nm | 146 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1220 kg | 1030 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 3520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2060 mm |
