1995 Audi TT vs. 1965 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1995 Audi TT is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Audi TT (150 HP) has 61 more horse power than 1965 Triumph 2000. (89 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1965 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Audi TT weights approximately 50 kg more than 1965 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1995 Audi TT (210 Nm) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm). This means 1995 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Audi TT | 1965 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Audi | Triumph |
| Model | TT | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1781 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 89 HP |
| Torque | 210 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 81.1 mm | 74.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 76 mm |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1220 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2700 mm |
