1995 Audi TT vs. 1966 Cadillac Sixty
To start off, 1995 Audi TT is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Cadillac Sixty (208 HP) has 58 more horse power than 1995 Audi TT. (150 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 1995 Audi TT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 895 kg more than 1995 Audi TT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1995 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Cadillac Sixty. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Audi TT | 1966 Cadillac Sixty | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | TT | Sixty |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1781 cc | 7029 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 208 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1220 kg | 2115 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 5790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1990 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 3390 mm |
