1995 Audi TT vs. 1972 Chrysler Charger
To start off, 1995 Audi TT is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Chrysler Charger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Chrysler Charger would be higher. At 3,523 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Chrysler Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Audi TT (150 HP) has 12 more horse power than 1972 Chrysler Charger. (138 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1972 Chrysler Charger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Chrysler Charger weights approximately 140 kg more than 1995 Audi TT.
Because 1995 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Chrysler Charger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Chrysler Charger (272 Nm) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Audi TT. (210 Nm). This means 1972 Chrysler Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Audi TT | 1972 Chrysler Charger | |
Make | Audi | Chrysler |
Model | TT | Charger |
Year Released | 1995 | 1972 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 3523 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 138 HP |
Torque | 210 Nm | 272 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1220 kg | 1360 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4570 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1890 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2680 mm |