1995 Audi TT vs. 1978 Mazda 626
To start off, 1995 Audi TT is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 1,781 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Audi TT weights approximately 175 kg more than 1978 Mazda 626.
Because 1995 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1978 Mazda 626. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Audi TT | 1978 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | TT | 626 |
Year Released | 1995 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 1586 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1220 kg | 1045 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2520 mm |