1995 Audi TT vs. 1980 Nissan Bluebird

To start off, 1995 Audi TT is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 2,393 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Nissan Bluebird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Audi TT (150 HP) has 30 more horse power than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. (120 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Nissan Bluebird weights approximately 50 kg more than 1995 Audi TT.

Because 1995 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Audi TT (210 Nm) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. (170 Nm). This means 1995 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. 1980 Nissan Bluebird has automatic transmission and 1995 Audi TT has manual transmission. 1995 Audi TT will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1980 Nissan Bluebird will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: