1995 Audi TT vs. 1982 Volvo 260
To start off, 1995 Audi TT is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Volvo 260. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Volvo 260 would be higher. At 2,849 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Volvo 260 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Volvo 260 (153 HP) has 3 more horse power than 1995 Audi TT. (150 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Volvo 260 should accelerate faster than 1995 Audi TT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Volvo 260 weights approximately 150 kg more than 1995 Audi TT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1995 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Volvo 260. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Volvo 260 (230 Nm) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Audi TT. (210 Nm). This means 1982 Volvo 260 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Audi TT | 1982 Volvo 260 | |
Make | Audi | Volvo |
Model | TT | 260 |
Year Released | 1995 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 2849 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 210 Nm | 230 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81.1 mm | 91 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 73 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1220 kg | 1370 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2660 mm |