1995 Audi TT vs. 1996 Mazda MPV
To start off, 1996 Mazda MPV is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Audi TT would be higher. At 2,954 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Mazda MPV is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Audi TT (150 HP) has 4 more horse power than 1996 Mazda MPV. (146 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1996 Mazda MPV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mazda MPV weights approximately 500 kg more than 1995 Audi TT.
Because 1995 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Mazda MPV. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mazda MPV (228 Nm) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Audi TT. (210 Nm). This means 1996 Mazda MPV will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Audi TT | 1996 Mazda MPV | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | TT | MPV |
Year Released | 1995 | 1996 |
Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 2954 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 146 HP |
Torque | 210 Nm | 228 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1220 kg | 1720 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2850 mm |