1995 Audi TT vs. 1997 Suzuki C2
To start off, 1997 Suzuki C2 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Audi TT would be higher. At 1,781 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Suzuki C2 (251 HP) has 101 more horse power than 1995 Audi TT. (150 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Suzuki C2 should accelerate faster than 1995 Audi TT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Audi TT weights approximately 372 kg more than 1997 Suzuki C2.
Because 1995 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 Suzuki C2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Suzuki C2 (284 Nm) has 74 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Audi TT. (210 Nm). This means 1997 Suzuki C2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Audi TT | 1997 Suzuki C2 | |
| Make | Audi | Suzuki |
| Model | TT | C2 |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1781 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 251 HP |
| Torque | 210 Nm | 284 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1220 kg | 848 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 3660 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2240 mm |
