1995 Audi TT vs. 2000 Chevrolet Astro
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Astro is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Audi TT would be higher. At 4,300 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Audi TT weights approximately 33 kg more than 2000 Chevrolet Astro.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Astro (339 Nm) has 129 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Audi TT. (210 Nm). This means 2000 Chevrolet Astro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Audi TT. 2000 Chevrolet Astro has automatic transmission and 1995 Audi TT has manual transmission. 1995 Audi TT will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Chevrolet Astro will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Audi TT | 2000 Chevrolet Astro | |
| Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
| Model | TT | Astro |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1781 cc | 4300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 210 Nm | 339 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 8 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1220 kg | 1187 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1980 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2790 mm |
